Marķējums
Vai Nutri-Score patiešām maina to, ko cilvēki pērk?
Daļēji. Lielāka ietekme var būt uz ražotājiem, kas reformulē, lai iegūtu labāku rezultātu, kas parasti nav debates tēma.
Ko atrod pārskati
2025. gada sistemātiskais pārskats par Nutri-Score efektivitāti [1] un pārskats par priekšējā iepakojuma marķējuma ietekmi [4] sakrīt: marķējumi maina pirkšanu vēlamajā virzienā, un šī maiņa ir neliela. Kritēriju validācijas darbs [2] risina citu un iepriekšēju jautājumu — vai algoritms rangē pārtiku tā, kā to darītu uztura zinātne — un atbilde ir plaši jā, ar zināmiem izņēmumiem.
Uztura indeksi, kas pamatojas uz šīm sistēmām, ir arī tikuši rūpīgi izpētīti [3], kas ir svarīgi, jo profilēšanas algoritms kodē apstrīdamus spriedumus par to, kuriem uzturvielām piešķirt svaru.
Priekšējā iepakojuma marķējuma ietekme
Zināmie izņēmumi
Kritiķi norāda uz olīveļļu, riekstiem un sieru, kas iegūst sliktākus rezultātus, nekā intuīcija liek domāt, un uz dažiem diētiskajiem dzērieniem, kas iegūst labus rezultātus. Daļa no tā ir taisnīga, un daļa nesaprot dizainu: Nutri-Score salīdzina kategorijās uz 100 g bāzes un nav spriedums par to, vai pārtika pieder veselīgai diētai.
Jaunākās algoritmu izmaiņas risināja vairākus no šiem gadījumiem. Dziļāka doma paliek: viena burts nevar kodēt visu par pārtiku, un izturēšanās pret to, it kā tas tā būtu, ir nepareiza lietošana, nevis trūkums.
Ko juridiski nozīmē veselības apgalvojums
ES uztura un veselības apgalvojumi ir regulēti: tikai autorizēti apgalvojumi ar pieņemtu pierādījumu bāzi var parādīties, un katrs ir saistīts ar konkrētiem lietošanas nosacījumiem. "Veicina normālu imūnsistēmas funkciju" ir licencēta frāze ar definētu pamatu, nevis mārketinga proza.
Tas, kas nav regulēts, ir viss, kas to ieskauj — attēli, izcelsmes valoda un termini kā "dabisks" vai "veselīgs". Regulētais apgalvojums bieži ir vismazāk maldinošais apgalvojums uz iepakojuma.
Bieži uzdotie jautājumi
Vai Nutri-Score ir precīzs?
Validācijas darbs atklāj, ka tas rangē pārtiku plaši saskaņā ar uztura kvalitāti [2], ar izņēmumiem un izmaiņām.
Kāpēc olīveļļa iegūst sliktus rezultātus?
Tā ir enerģijas blīva un tiek vērtēta uz 100 g. Sistēma salīdzina kategorijās, nevis pasludina pārtiku par labu vai sliktu.
Vai Nutri-Score būtu obligāts ES?
Politiskā jautājums. Pierādījumi atbalsta "tas nedaudz palīdz un nenodara kaitējumu", kas ir vājāks arguments nekā jebkura puse apgalvo.
Atsauces
Katrs zemāk minētais citāts saista ar oriģinālo recenzēto ierakstu PubMed vai caur DOI. Nekas šeit nav aizvietotājs medicīnas padomam.
-
Efficacy of phytosterols for reduction of cardiometabolic risk factors: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and updated dose-response meta-analyses of randomized trials Zurbau A, Haintz L, Chen V, et al. · Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026 · Meta-analysis DOIPubMed 42275989
-
Nutri-Score effectiveness in improving consumers' nutrition literacy, food choices, health, and healthy eating pattern adherence: A systematic review Muzzioli L, Scenna D, Frigerio F, et al. · Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) · 2025 · Systematic review DOIPubMed 40712552
-
Criterion validation of nutrient profiling systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis Barrett EM, Afrin H, Rayner M, et al. · The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2024 · Meta-analysis DOIPubMed 37863430
-
Dietary indices underpinning front-of-pack nutrition labels and health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies Montericcio A, Bonaccio M, Ghulam A, et al. · The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2024 · Meta-analysis DOIPubMed 38145705
-
The Potential Effectiveness of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labeling for Improving Population Diets Kelly B, Ng SH, Carrad A, et al. · Annual review of nutrition · 2024 · Systematic review DOIPubMed 38857543
-
The Potential Effectiveness of Nutrient Declarations and Nutrition and Health Claims for Improving Population Diets Kelly B, Ng SH, Carrad A, et al. · Annual review of nutrition · 2024 · Systematic review DOIPubMed 38857539
-
Impact of front-of-pack nutrition labelling in consumer understanding and use across socio-economic status: A systematic review Shrestha A, Cullerton K, White KM, et al. · Appetite · 2023 · Systematic review DOIPubMed 37169260
-
Lifestyle, psychological and socio-demographic drivers in functional food choice: a systematic literature review based on bibliometric and network analysis Zanchini R, Di Vita G, Brun F · International journal of food sciences and nutrition · 2022 · Systematic review DOIPubMed 35264074
-
A Systematic Review of Salt Reduction Initiatives Around the World: A Midterm Evaluation of Progress Towards the 2025 Global Non-Communicable Diseases Salt Reduction Target Santos JA, Tekle D, Rosewarne E, et al. · Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021 · Systematic review DOIPubMed 33693460Full text
-
Impact of color-coded and warning nutrition labelling schemes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Song J, Brown MK, Tan M, et al. · PLoS medicine · 2021 · Meta-analysis DOIPubMed 34610024Full text
-
Health Benefits of Whey or Colostrum Supplementation in Adults ≥35 Years; a Systematic Review Blair M, Kellow NJ, Dordevic AL, et al. · Nutrients · 2020 · Systematic review DOIPubMed 31979025Full text
-
The relationship between food label use and dietary intake in adults: A systematic review Anastasiou K, Miller M, Dickinson K · Appetite · 2019 · Systematic review DOIPubMed 31010704
-
Claimed effects, outcome variables and methods of measurement for health claims proposed under European Community Regulation 1924/2006 in the area of blood glucose and insulin concentrations Martini D, Biasini B, Zavaroni I, et al. · Acta diabetologica · 2018 · Clinical guideline DOIPubMed 29383587
-
Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: functional foods Crowe KM, Francis C · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2013 · Clinical guideline DOIPubMed 23885705
-
Review of the efficacy of green tea, isoflavones and aloe vera supplements based on randomised controlled trials Williamson G, Coppens P, Serra-Majem L, et al. · Food & function · 2011 · Systematic review DOIPubMed 21927741
-
Position of the American Dietetic Association: functional foods Hasler CM, Brown AC · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · 2009 · Clinical guideline DOIPubMed 19338113
-
Effectiveness of regular oat β-glucan-enriched bread compared with whole-grain wheat bread on long-term glycemic control in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial Hjorth T, Schadow A, Revheim I, et al. · The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025 · Randomised controlled trial DOIPubMed 40571100Full text
-
A randomized controlled trial to test the effects of displaying the Nutri-Score in food advertising on consumer perceptions and intentions to purchase and consume Courbet D, Jacquemier L, Hercberg S, et al. · The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024 · Randomised controlled trial DOIPubMed 38622707Full text
-
The impact of the nutri-score on food choice: A choice experiment in a Dutch supermarket van den Akker K, Bartelet D, Brouwer L, et al. · Appetite · 2022 · Randomised controlled trial DOIPubMed 34453996
-
Labels Affect Food Choices, but in What Ways? Kühne SJ, Reijnen E, Granja G, et al. · Nutrients · 2022 · Randomised controlled trial DOIPubMed 35956380Full text
-
Nutri-Score and NutrInform Battery: Effects on Performance and Preference in Italian Consumers Fialon M, Serafini M, Galan P, et al. · Nutrients · 2022 · Randomised controlled trial DOIPubMed 36079769Full text
-
Impact of different front-of-pack nutrition labels on online food choices Santos O, Alarcão V, Feteira-Santos R, et al. · Appetite · 2020 · Randomised controlled trial DOIPubMed 32798050
-
Functional Foods in Modern Nutrition Science: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Public Health Implications Fekete M, Lehoczki A, Kryczyk-Poprawa A, et al. · Nutrients · 2025 · Review DOIPubMed 40647258Full text
-
Establishing an EU-wide front-of-pack nutrition label: Review of options and model-based evaluation Devaux M, Aldea A, Lerouge A, et al. · Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2024 · Review DOIPubMed 38326224
-
Towards unified and impactful policies to reduce ultra-processed food consumption and promote healthier eating Popkin BM, Barquera S, Corvalan C, et al. · The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2021 · Review DOIPubMed 33865500Full text
-
The Influence of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling on Consumer Behavior and Product Reformulation Roberto CA, Ng SW, Ganderats-Fuentes M, et al. · Annual review of nutrition · 2021 · Review DOIPubMed 34339293
-
Impact of Salt Intake on the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Hypertension Rust P, Ekmekcioglu C · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017 · Review DOIPubMed 27757935
-
Appetite control: methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods Blundell J, de Graaf C, Hulshof T, et al. · Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2010 · Review DOIPubMed 20122136Full text
-
Purchase behavior reported by Mexican adults after implementing the front-of-pack warning labels Sagaceta-Mejia J, Durán R, Munguía A, et al. · Salud publica de Mexico · 2025 · Journal article DOIPubMed 41150992
-
[Nutri-Score: A public health tool validated by science and fought by agri-food lobbies] Hercberg S · Bulletin du cancer · 2024 · Journal article DOIPubMed 38565441
-
Front-of-pack labels: "Directive" versus "informative" approaches Donini LM, Berry EM, Folkvord F, et al. · Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) · 2023 · Journal article DOIPubMed 36401998
-
"Front-of-pack" nutrition labeling Sinu Scientific Board, Sinu Scientific Committee · Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD · 2021 · Journal article DOIPubMed 34565661