Endrer Nutri-Score faktisk hva folk kjøper?

Q: Endrer merker atferd?

Moderat. Reformulering kan være den større effekten.

Hva gjennomgangene finner

En systematisk gjennomgang fra 2025 av Nutri-Scores effektivitet ^[1] og en gjennomgang av effekten av merking på pakken ^[4] konvergerer: merker flytter kjøp i ønsket retning, og skiftet er lite. Kriterievalideringsarbeid ^[2] tar for seg et annet og tidligere spørsmål — om algoritmen rangerer matvarer slik ernæringsvitenskapen ville gjort — og svaret er stort sett ja, med kjente unntak.

De kostholdsmessige indeksene som ligger til grunn for disse systemene har også blitt gransket ^[3], noe som er viktig fordi en profileringalgoritme koder omstridte vurderinger om hvilke næringsstoffer som skal vektlegges.

Effekter av merking på pakken

De kjente unntakene

Kritikere peker på at olivenolje, nøtter og ost scorer dårligere enn intuisjonen antyder, og at noen diettdrikker scorer godt. Noe av dette er rettferdig, og noe misforstår designet: Nutri-Score sammenligner innen kategorier på en per-100 g basis og er ikke en dom over hvorvidt en matvare hører hjemme i et sunt kosthold.

Nylige revisjoner av algoritmen adresserte flere av disse tilfellene. Det dypere poenget står: en enkelt bokstav kan ikke kode alt om en matvare, og å behandle det som om det gjør det, er en misbruk snarere enn en feil.

Hva en helsepåstand juridisk betyr

I EU er ernærings- og helsepåstander regulert: kun autoriserte påstander med et akseptert evidensgrunnlag kan vises, og hver er knyttet til spesifikke bruksbetingelser. "Bidrar til normal immunfunksjon" er en lisensiert frase med et definert grunnlag, ikke markedsføringsprosa.

Det som ikke er regulert, er alt som omgir det — bilder, språk om opprinnelse, og termer som "naturlig" eller "helsebringende". Den regulerte påstanden er ofte den minst villedende uttalelsen på pakken.

Vanlige spørsmål

Er Nutri-Score nøyaktig?

Valideringsarbeid finner at den rangerer matvarer stort sett i samsvar med ernæringskvalitet ^[2], med unntak og revisjoner.

Hvorfor scorer olivenolje dårlig?

Den er energitett og scores per 100 g. Systemet sammenligner innen kategorier i stedet for å erklære matvarer som gode eller dårlige.

Endrer merker atferd?

Moderat ^[1][4]. Reformulering kan være den større effekten.

Bør Nutri-Score være obligatorisk i EU?

Et politisk spørsmål. Bevisene støtter "det hjelper litt og gjør ingen skade", som er et svakere argument enn hva noen av leirene fremfører.

Referanser

Hver henvisning nedenfor lenker til den originale fagfellevurderte artikkelen på PubMed eller via DOI. Ingenting her er en erstatning for medisinsk råd.

Efficacy of phytosterols for reduction of cardiometabolic risk factors: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and updated dose-response meta-analyses of randomized trials Zurbau A, Haintz L, Chen V, et al. · Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026 · Meta-analysis DOI PubMed 42275989
Nutri-Score effectiveness in improving consumers' nutrition literacy, food choices, health, and healthy eating pattern adherence: A systematic review Muzzioli L, Scenna D, Frigerio F, et al. · Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) · 2025 · Systematic review DOI PubMed 40712552
Criterion validation of nutrient profiling systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis Barrett EM, Afrin H, Rayner M, et al. · The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2024 · Meta-analysis DOI PubMed 37863430
Dietary indices underpinning front-of-pack nutrition labels and health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies Montericcio A, Bonaccio M, Ghulam A, et al. · The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2024 · Meta-analysis DOI PubMed 38145705
The Potential Effectiveness of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labeling for Improving Population Diets Kelly B, Ng SH, Carrad A, et al. · Annual review of nutrition · 2024 · Systematic review DOI PubMed 38857543
The Potential Effectiveness of Nutrient Declarations and Nutrition and Health Claims for Improving Population Diets Kelly B, Ng SH, Carrad A, et al. · Annual review of nutrition · 2024 · Systematic review DOI PubMed 38857539
Impact of front-of-pack nutrition labelling in consumer understanding and use across socio-economic status: A systematic review Shrestha A, Cullerton K, White KM, et al. · Appetite · 2023 · Systematic review DOI PubMed 37169260
Lifestyle, psychological and socio-demographic drivers in functional food choice: a systematic literature review based on bibliometric and network analysis Zanchini R, Di Vita G, Brun F · International journal of food sciences and nutrition · 2022 · Systematic review DOI PubMed 35264074
A Systematic Review of Salt Reduction Initiatives Around the World: A Midterm Evaluation of Progress Towards the 2025 Global Non-Communicable Diseases Salt Reduction Target Santos JA, Tekle D, Rosewarne E, et al. · Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021 · Systematic review DOI PubMed 33693460 Full text
Impact of color-coded and warning nutrition labelling schemes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Song J, Brown MK, Tan M, et al. · PLoS medicine · 2021 · Meta-analysis DOI PubMed 34610024 Full text
Health Benefits of Whey or Colostrum Supplementation in Adults ≥35 Years; a Systematic Review Blair M, Kellow NJ, Dordevic AL, et al. · Nutrients · 2020 · Systematic review DOI PubMed 31979025 Full text
The relationship between food label use and dietary intake in adults: A systematic review Anastasiou K, Miller M, Dickinson K · Appetite · 2019 · Systematic review DOI PubMed 31010704
Claimed effects, outcome variables and methods of measurement for health claims proposed under European Community Regulation 1924/2006 in the area of blood glucose and insulin concentrations Martini D, Biasini B, Zavaroni I, et al. · Acta diabetologica · 2018 · Clinical guideline DOI PubMed 29383587
Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: functional foods Crowe KM, Francis C · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2013 · Clinical guideline DOI PubMed 23885705
Review of the efficacy of green tea, isoflavones and aloe vera supplements based on randomised controlled trials Williamson G, Coppens P, Serra-Majem L, et al. · Food & function · 2011 · Systematic review DOI PubMed 21927741
Position of the American Dietetic Association: functional foods Hasler CM, Brown AC · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · 2009 · Clinical guideline DOI PubMed 19338113
Effectiveness of regular oat β-glucan-enriched bread compared with whole-grain wheat bread on long-term glycemic control in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial Hjorth T, Schadow A, Revheim I, et al. · The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025 · Randomised controlled trial DOI PubMed 40571100 Full text
A randomized controlled trial to test the effects of displaying the Nutri-Score in food advertising on consumer perceptions and intentions to purchase and consume Courbet D, Jacquemier L, Hercberg S, et al. · The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024 · Randomised controlled trial DOI PubMed 38622707 Full text
The impact of the nutri-score on food choice: A choice experiment in a Dutch supermarket van den Akker K, Bartelet D, Brouwer L, et al. · Appetite · 2022 · Randomised controlled trial DOI PubMed 34453996
Labels Affect Food Choices, but in What Ways? Kühne SJ, Reijnen E, Granja G, et al. · Nutrients · 2022 · Randomised controlled trial DOI PubMed 35956380 Full text
Nutri-Score and NutrInform Battery: Effects on Performance and Preference in Italian Consumers Fialon M, Serafini M, Galan P, et al. · Nutrients · 2022 · Randomised controlled trial DOI PubMed 36079769 Full text
Impact of different front-of-pack nutrition labels on online food choices Santos O, Alarcão V, Feteira-Santos R, et al. · Appetite · 2020 · Randomised controlled trial DOI PubMed 32798050
Functional Foods in Modern Nutrition Science: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Public Health Implications Fekete M, Lehoczki A, Kryczyk-Poprawa A, et al. · Nutrients · 2025 · Review DOI PubMed 40647258 Full text
Establishing an EU-wide front-of-pack nutrition label: Review of options and model-based evaluation Devaux M, Aldea A, Lerouge A, et al. · Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2024 · Review DOI PubMed 38326224
Towards unified and impactful policies to reduce ultra-processed food consumption and promote healthier eating Popkin BM, Barquera S, Corvalan C, et al. · The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2021 · Review DOI PubMed 33865500 Full text
The Influence of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling on Consumer Behavior and Product Reformulation Roberto CA, Ng SW, Ganderats-Fuentes M, et al. · Annual review of nutrition · 2021 · Review DOI PubMed 34339293
Impact of Salt Intake on the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Hypertension Rust P, Ekmekcioglu C · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017 · Review DOI PubMed 27757935
Appetite control: methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods Blundell J, de Graaf C, Hulshof T, et al. · Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2010 · Review DOI PubMed 20122136 Full text
Purchase behavior reported by Mexican adults after implementing the front-of-pack warning labels Sagaceta-Mejia J, Durán R, Munguía A, et al. · Salud publica de Mexico · 2025 · Journal article DOI PubMed 41150992
[Nutri-Score: A public health tool validated by science and fought by agri-food lobbies] Hercberg S · Bulletin du cancer · 2024 · Journal article DOI PubMed 38565441
Front-of-pack labels: "Directive" versus "informative" approaches Donini LM, Berry EM, Folkvord F, et al. · Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) · 2023 · Journal article DOI PubMed 36401998
"Front-of-pack" nutrition labeling Sinu Scientific Board, Sinu Scientific Committee · Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD · 2021 · Journal article DOI PubMed 34565661